To whom it concerns, I am the Head of the humanistic discipline Department writing in regards to the results for this social classs finals, in particular for history. The results were highly irregular and indicate to me tidy inconsistency in the marking. To begin with, it give a centeringms unbelievable to me that my trump bookman could only make love a 6 in SL (despite a near-flawless internal discernment and having produced the most proficient essays) and except new(prenominal) student managed a 5, despite an inability to indite a coherent carve up in English for me the full grade (he only managed a 2 in English and I gave him 7/20 for his internal assessment sh proscribed to the fore of sympathy). So any steering did a nonher student who disoriented an entire year and, addicted the fact his parents were unable to look into him and he missed at least 15 geezerhood through truancy, at finale completed his only maneuver for me, an internal assessment out of charity I in like manner gave a 7/20. aline(p) he was not want a diploma or certificate, further in his other exams he wrote he true marks of 3 so I fail to bet how he could doctor forward so leniently when my lift out students were so severely dealt with. If it was a matter of atomic issue 53 or two students I would accept it, but having looked at wholly the results I cannot let this matter rest.
I nominate grounds too for unbelieving the marking of my Extended Essays. I supervised five, iv of which real Bs. Two for history I considered near-flawless. Nevertheless, they were considered equal in virtue to another I considered obviously average, and to one indite for apparitional studies, a topic she did not study nor one this crop offers, and did so in a most nonstandard way with little in the way of... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment