A Peoples History Of The United States

A multitude s denounce of the linked StatesIn A pile s account of the United States , Howard Zinn has contentions with patriotism as an ideology . This hand non be the initiatory succession he raises much(prenominal) a sentiment . much than a quarter century after the publication of A People s History , Zinn celebrates emancipation Day with an essay c every(prenominal)ed Put Away The Flags , in which he urges that the Statesns renounce nationalism . For Zinn (2006 , nationalism is a dodgy invention that insists devotion to the move over and to a boundary so infuriated it engenders mass take - angiotensin-converting enzymeness of the great evils of our time , on with racism , along with religious hatred and maintainhs an pressure sensation in song that divinity fudge must single place America to be blessedIn A People s History , Zinn quotes hydrogen Kissinger s promulgation that History is the keeping of states and takes issue with it because the memory of states flattens the perspectives and liaisons of a assorted population of varying races , sexes and categoryes into a homogeneous one that valorizes governments and diplomats and privileges the elect(ip) (Zinn 9-10 . His skepticism is founded on the thinking that the United States of America as a family of common interest is one that is utter pretenseZinn does give some(prenominal) exceptions to this teaching , noting that nationalism is relatively innocuous in infinitesimal countries such(prenominal) as Switzerland and Norway that have not the military function or expansionist ambition that characterizes the United States But in a nation like ours - large , possessing thousands of weapons of mass ravaging - what might have been harmless self-respect becomes an arrogant nationalism unreliable to former(a)s and to ourselves (Zinn 2006He maintains this position further by insisting we . refute the melodic theme that our nation is unlike from , morally superior to , the other purple powers of world history .

We expect to assert our commitment to the military man race , and not to all one nationAll this goes clog up to the opening statement of the fourthly chapter of A People s History (Zinn 59 , where he notes that the understructure of a legal unity called the United States would permit the elite group persons of the British colonies to harness the resentment of the working class towards England and alley it towards a consensus of popular financial support for the rule of a sweet , privileged leadershipI find myself agreeing with Zinn , to the termination that nationalism presupposes common interest and denies the conflicting interests of communities , for the very straightforward reason that it denies the plurality of American glossinessIt ignores the fact that America s hoi polloi is do up of a heterogeneously varied population from all cultures : Jews , Asians Irish , Italians , etc and that what makes the country so different from others is that it is truly a melting pot in which cultural conflict and class differences should - in an ideal America - enrich and strengthen the culture . It is the dissolving agent of such differences , the means by which we acknowledge stand mansion among the classes , races...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper